I love how so many of the beliefs about dissent, criticism, and correction of leadership are based in the language of scripture and the temple regarding "evil speaking of the Lord's anointed."
Where did we get the idea that this phrase only applies to leadership?
"Evil speaking" is defined so narrowly in our community, more so than the scriptures ever defined it.
Let all bitterness, and wrath, and , and clamour, and , be put away from you, with all :
And be ye one to another, tenderhearted, one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.
Eph. 4:31-32
These were universal instructions that applied to all members of the Church, independent of any position they might have held.
And see that there is no iniquity in the church, neither with each other, neither lying, , nor ;
And see that the church meet together often, and also see that all the members do their duty.
D&C 20:54-55
This behavior doesn't become acceptable just because a church leader, or someone attempting to defend a church leader, engages in it. But who is holding them accountable when they do this behind closed doors? It still happens because it shields leadership from scrutiny and indemnifies their "evil speaking" against others. It has created a culture that perpetuates abuse and prevents repentance in our leadership.
Every single person that has ever passed through the temple has been anointed. It is just as wrong for church leadership to speak evil and spread misinformation about other members as it is for us to do it to them.The fact is, I have also been anointed by God. I don't need a leadership position in the Church for that to be true. But how easy it would be for one all-male council in this church to completely destroy my name and credibility.
It bothers me that this doesn't bother more people.
